Allocate: grant bodies and national authorities
Every application, scored to a standard you can defend.
TACTIC gives a funder one documented read on every venture in an intake, with an audit record behind every score, so a selection stands up when a board, an auditor, or an applicant asks why.
How it works
An intake is only as strong as the standard behind it.
A home-made scorecard in a spreadsheet, rebuilt for each intake, with weights nobody can defend a year later.
Every score, on the record.
Every assessment has a write-once audit record behind it, which you can export.
The same standard for every venture.
Every venture is scored on the same canonical rubric and weights, so any two are directly comparable.
On Evaluation and Deep Assessment, missing evidence is marked as missing, never quietly scored as weak.
Submit a batch of ventures, group them into a cohort, rank them, and export the result.
A method your panel can stand behind.
TACTIC scores a venture on four weighted dimensions: technical innovation, market potential, team capability, and implementation feasibility.
- Four dimensions, weighted 30, 25, 25, and 20
- Evaluation and Deep Assessment score twenty sub-dimensions, and cite the passage of the submission behind a sub-score wherever that passage is found in the submission.
- The Uniqueness Coefficient reads how differentiated a venture is, from its patent landscape, competitive position, technical differentiation and likely impact. Live on Deep Assessment and Dossier.
- The method is documented, weighted, and anchored in established frameworks such as the NASA TRLs. It scores the factors rather than predicting an outcome.
Run multi-round judging with blind review and declared conflicts of interest.
Continuum is what comes after the score.
TACTIC takes a venture as far as the assessment, the score, and the report. Continuum is what comes after: how a venture, or a whole cohort, gets better from there.
Continuum begins with a TACTIC-scored, selected cohort, and is never sold standalone.
